Industry Blog

Uni-Dust Cyclone Case Study


Introduction

A major pharmaceutical company was losing powder from tablet presses and capsule filling machines. This caused a dangerous cocktail of powders to form in the central dust extraction system and was also blocking the expensive HEPA filter at the heart of this system. Having heard of the cyclone, they approached Hanningfield to learn if the innovative dust containment system could benefit them - it could.

 

Our Solution

The cyclone was initially trialled by attaching it to a capsule filling machine, to analyse the effectiveness of the cyclone in capturing a standard pharmaceutical powder - the results were staggering. The filterless cyclone was able to capture over 95% of all excess powder, which is collected in a ‘catch-pot’ at the bottom of the cyclone. This allows the contents to be weighed for batch loss reconciliation, which is excellent for FDA compliance.

The real monetary saving, however, was in protecting the central HEPA filter. Each cyclone has an individual “police” HEPA filter which increases system efficiency to 99.99%, allowing the clean air to flow to the normal dust extraction unit.

As the equipment is designed to be retrofitted to any dust generating plant, process validation is not affected, making it ideal for both new and existing processes.

 

Results and Conclusions

The cyclone was an undoubted success and helped protect the main filter from continual blockage. This was very expensive to replace but required changing every 6
months due to the extreme wear and tear. The cyclone system has saved the central filter to make replacement much more infrequent, saving vast amounts of money and offering an incredible return on investment.

The system also helps protects operators by capturing excess dust in the process room, preventing the formation of a dangerous mix of powders. The customer was extremely pleased with the cyclone and now has more than 40 units installed worldwide.

 

Key Facts

- Capture Over 95% of Excess Dust: The Hanningfield cyclone is capable of capturing most of the dust lost during processing. For this case study, the customer was able to capture and collect over 95% of all powder. In-house trials have achieved results of up to 99.99% efficiency on a pharmaceutical powder.

- Protect Central Dust Extraction: By protecting the central dust extraction system, the customer made vast savings in time, money and improved hygiene, simply by installing the cyclone to their capsule filling machines and tablet presses. This ensured an excellent return on investment (ROI) by protecting the expensive filters in the central dust extraction system.

- Keep Operators Safe: By preventing a dangerous cocktail of powders from forming in the central dust extraction system, operators are kept safe. Instead, dangerous powders are captured in a ‘catch-pot’.

- Comply with FDA Guidelines: Comply with FDA Guidelines; By capturing excess dust in a ‘catch-pot’ the customer was able to undertake batch loss reconciliation, to account for the losses in processing. This is excellent practice and ensures compliance with FDA guidelines.

For more information on the Uni-Dust cyclone, please click here.

Uni-Dust Cyclone in Action

The loss of excess powder from compression and filling machines is one of the major problems in powder processing. Often, powder passing to the central extraction system wil cause downstream filters to block or a dangerous mix of powders to form in the central system itself. If filters blind they can be expensive and time-consuming to replace.

Hanningfield’s solution takes the form of a filterless recovery cyclone - the ‘Uni-Dust’. The cyclone can be fitted (or retrofitted) between the compression/filling machine and the LEV line inside the process room. The cyclone then separates the dense powder particles from the air, allowing clean air to pass down the LEV line and the solid powder material to be collected in a capture-pot at the base of the cyclone, ready for batch loss reconciliation. This capture-pot is also available with a safe-change facility to protect operators.

The Hanningfield Uni-Dust cyclone offers a best-practice solution to the problem of handling excess powder, with typical capture rates of over 95% on most pharmaceutical and food powders.

We are able to offer free trials on your powder at our UK Test Facility. If you are interested in testing your material on our cyclone, simply contact us.

Achieving a Dust-Free Milling Process

Modern processes often use high potency APIs and other ingredients, which are potentially dangerous if mishandled - this is a particular concern during milling, a process which is notorious for generating dust. Hence, in order to protect both the operator and the process environment, it is important to consider various methods which could be used to help minimise this problem.

There are a number of ways to contain dust during cone milling, this article shall focus primarily on three methods; in-line vacuum transfer, container-to-container milling and milling inside an isolator. All three techniques offer an efficient and effective way to achieve dust-free milling.

 

In-line Vacuum Transfer

Feeding and discharging from a cone mill using a vacuum is a particularly effective method for achieving dust-free milling. This process not only contains the dust, but also automates the process and minimises waste - helping customers make efficiency savings.

Using an in-line vacuum transfer system (such as the Hanningfield Uni-Vac), material is automatically fed into the inlet chute, and is also automatically drawn from the outlet of the mill. This process ensures that from pick-up to discharge, the system is fully enclosed, preventing the escape of dust.

 

Container-to-Container Milling

This solution uses the principle of gravity to feed product through the mill. By positioning a bin above the mill, and another bin below the mill, product is released from the top IBC, milled, and then passes directly into the bottom IBC.

This creates a totally contained, in-line solution for milling. Not only does this contain the product during the milling phase, but this is also a simple and effective method for transferring product from bin-to-bin, and cone milling the product en-route.

 

Isolator Milling

One suggested method for the containment of such fine powder during milling, is the use of an isolator or ‘glove-box’ to ensure all excess material remains contained, ensuring the fine dust particles are not exposed to either atmosphere or operator.

Cone mill integration within the isolator is performed by means of through the wall fixing flange. This fixing flange and particular configuration of the cone mill allow for a physical division of the cone mill head by the technical area that is left outside the isolator. Thanks to this special configuration all cone mill cleaning operations are performed within the isolator by means of gloves or half-suit, reducing any risk of exposure for the operator and avoiding any transport to cleaning room.

Another benefit of isolator milling is for achieving a zoned area such as ATEX. The isolator itself creates an ATEX environment for milling, ensuring the entire process environment (including motors and controls) do not need to be changed to comply with the necessary requirements. Learn more about milling in an isolator here.

 

Conclusions

In a modern process, containing dust is extremely important.  This can be easily achieved during the cone milling stage, simply by employing one of the methods listed above.  Each solution will be more or less suited to any particular application.

For more information on how to contain dust during processing, please just contact us.

Contained Milling: Utilising a Cone Mill inside an Isolator

A Technical Article by James Ellis (Hanningfield) and Stefano Butti (F.P.S. Food and Pharma Systems S.r.l.)


Abstract

Cone milling is one of the most prevalent methods of size reduction in the process industries. Due to the ever-increasing potency of process material (APIs etc) containment becomes an essential element of modern day processing considerations.

One suggested method for the containment of such fine powder during milling, is the use of an isolator to ensure all excess material remains contained, ensuring the fine dust particles are not exposed to either atmosphere or operator. Understanding when to use an isolator, and how to use it, can be essential to ensuring the milling process meets required and advised processing guidelines.


1. Introduction

The increasing popularity and potency of new pharmaceutical API’s, HAPI’s and sterile products makes the need for tailor-made containment a priority. This is necessary to continuously meet the required safety standards and to ensure an appropriate level of advanced technology is in place to support research activities, product developments and final production phases.

‘The increasing potency of API’s has made containment during milling a hot topic.’

This concern is particularly relevant in relation to mechanical milling methods, such as cone milling. Milling is a process which can generate fine dust particles - this is a problem which needs to be deeply analysed and investigated to ensure proper levels of containment, ergonomy and process accuracy are maintained. For this reason, choosing to integrate a mill with an isolator is a matter of acute technical importance.

Cone milling is one of the most common methods of milling in the pharmaceutical and allied industries. Although cone mills often produce less dust than alternative forms of milling, there is still some level of dust generation. An excellent solution for containing this is to use an isolator for keeping the mill, and therefore an excess dust, enclosed within the booth.

However, in order to properly evaluate when to use a containment booth, we must first gain an in-depth understanding of both cone milling and isolation chambers.


2. Cone Milling - Dust Generating Process

Cone milling is an extremely effective machine for size reduction. Material is fed into the cone mill through an in-feed chute. This can either be charged into the mill using a vacuum or gravity feed. The material passes to a rotating impeller which forces the material through the holes in the screen (without metal-to-metal contact). Once the material has passed through the screen, the finished product falls from the bottom of the mill to a receptacle beneath.

However, one common problem in cone milling, similar to all other forms of size reduction, is the generation of dust. The dust is formed during the grinding stage of milling, and can become air-borne if mishandled.

To protect both the operator and the process environment, it is often advisable to consider methods for keeping this dust contained. This is particularly pertinent to many modern processes, which use increasingly potent API’s or other potentially harmful substances. Often, the best solution is to completely contain the mill by means of housing it.

This can be achieved inside a transparent isolator, which completely contains the product (and any excess generated dust). The flexibility of a cone mill makes this easy to achieve, as tooling changes are simple to undertake, even when using isolator gloves. Hence the isolator continues to offer process flexibility to allow for screen/impeller changes and dismantling for cleaning.

Another important consideration is ATEX. By housing the mill inside an isolator, one can achieve ATEX requirements inside the isolator, even if the process room itself does not conform to ATEX. Hence, an isolator offers a simple method for achieving an ATEX process, without needing to adapt the entire process environment.


3. Integrating Containment Methods

Cone mill integration within the isolator is performed by means of through the wall fixing flange. This fixing flange and particular configuration of the cone mill allow for a physical division of the cone mill head by the technical area that is left outside the isolator. Thanks to this special configuration all cone mill cleaning operation are performed within the isolator by means of gloves or half-suit, reducing any risk of exposure for the operator and avoiding any transport to cleaning room.

For this reason, ergonomy within the isolator is one of the most important features, which should always be properly checked in a preliminary study at the design stage. Often, the best way to achieve the optimal design is a combination of technical drawings and prototypes. A prototype can be used for the simulation of all operations to be performed within the isolator (charging into mill, milling, discharging, weighting, cleaning and maintenance).

An isolator can be used to house an cone mill, for containment during milling.

‘An isolator can be used to house an cone mill, for containment during milling.’

One of the foremost considerations when contemplating the use of an isolator is the product charging phase. From a containment perspective, it is important to understand where the product is coming from and in which kind of container (rigid, flexible, IBC etc.). in order to define a suitable isolator introducing method (pre-chamber, RTP, Split Valve, direct connection on process equipment etc.)

Proper planning at this stage will make the product charging/discharging phase easier. A proper connection system is required for the mill charging/discharging phase to reduce dust generation and increase product yield. Accurate weighting is also available at the cone mill discharging stage, by means of a custom designed and built packing-off station.

For specific product conditioning requirements, it is possible to integrate various milling techniques to achieve the desired outcome. For example, inerting of the mill head, or cryogenic milling with an individual control system for exhaust gas by means of dedicated ventilation. Sterile configuration of the system may also prove beneficial within the isolator. Sterilisation media by means of steam and VHP may also be considered.

Finally, an isolator can prove highly flexible, as it can be used for processes other than cone milling. It is possible to use the same isolator to integrate pin-mills (PSD 50-150 μm), Q-mills (PSD 20-100 μm) and spiral jet-mills (PSD 1-20 μm).


4. Conclusion

In conclusion, there are many considerations when cone milling a product. However, one of the foremost considerations is the issue of dust generation.

An isolator offers a simple and effective solution to this problem, by containing the dust within the isolator, ensuring it does not escape to atmosphere. Meanwhile, the isolator draws upon the flexibility offered by a cone mill, enabling quick and easy tooling changes.

Another advantage of an isolator is that it is an excellent means of achieving an explosion-proof process. The isolator itself creates an ATEX environment for milling, ensuring the entire process does not need to be changed to comply with the necessary requirements.

To integrate a cone mill with an isolator requires many variables to be considered. However, by properly evaluating the process, one can easily achieve an optimal process, which conforms to modern processing guidelines, simply by integrating these two pieces of highly flexible processing equipment.


A ‘Shared-Knowledge’ Article between Hanningfield (UK) and F.P.S. (Italy)

Pharmaceutical Powder Loading

The loading of machines with powder can be a complicated and troublesome process.

The biggest issue is nearly always containment. How do you ensure that no powder is leaked or lost during the transfer?

A common problem occurs during the loading of tablet presses, granulators, high-shear mixer, capsule filling machines etc. Often these are loaded from IBCs in the room above the process room. The difficult part is ensuring the powder transfers from the IBC to the machine without any mishaps.  There are a number of ways to achieve a solution including utilising a rotary valve for controlling the flow of powder, or an interlock system between feed chute and IBC outlet.

An alternative problem maybe loading a machine that is on the same floor as the IBC.  How do you transfer the powder from the IBC, into the machine, without spilling or losing powder? In this scenario vacuum transfer is an excellent method of overcoming this problem.

Hanningfield have more than 20 years experience in pharmaceutical processing and have helped numerous manufacturers to solve this problem.  All our equipment is manufactured by ourselves in the United Kingdom. Although each application is different, each objective is the same - to load powder into the machine without any issues.

For more information on how to solve this problem, please just contact us.


Containment Q&A

Question and Answer with Colin Ellis (Managing Director, Hanningfield)


As the issue of containment becomes evermore topical, Hanningfield’s Managing Director, Colin Ellis, answers some questions about containment, offering advice, opinion and dispelling a few myths.

 

Q. Firstly, what do you mean by containment?
A.

Containment is the prevention of contamination by means of a barrier. This can mean the contamination of the product, the operator or the environment. Generally people think of containment as stopping contaminants getting out, but it is also equally about stopping contaminants getting in; this is why the barrier is important.

The difficult balance to address is how to create a barrier for containment without affecting ease of operation. It is this problem which challenges manufacturers and equipment suppliers alike.

 

Q. Why has the issue of containment become so pertinent recently?
A.

The issue of containment has always been relevant. However, I think it is fair to say that it has become a particularly hot topic over the past few years - no doubt that ever improving health and safety standards have played a huge part in this. Also manufacturers, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry, are using ever more potent ingredients; the potential dangers associated with these make it is essential that they are properly handled and contained.

It is important to remember that containment is not just a ‘buzzword’, rather it is a method of keeping processes safe and secure.

 

Q. Which industries does containment apply to?
A.

With increasingly strict standards in relation to the exposure of operators to hazardous materials, it means that a broad spectrum of industries, such as pharmaceutical, food, minerals, chemicals and ceramics are all subject to strict legislation for containment.

In fact any industry involved in powder processing or any activity which produces dust should be making every effort to reduce employee exposure to health hazards and explosion risk.

 

Q. What are major benefits of containment?
A.

The importance of powder containment needs to be fully understood to reduce operational injuries and industrial claims, as well as improving general hygiene standards and issues affecting the welfare of employees. Although welfare is a major factor in controlling exposure to hazards other benefits are reduced waste, less likelihood of a dust explosion and an improved working environment.

 

Q. Are there any simple ways to comply with containment?
A.

Most dust or excess powder material is created during transfer or transportation within the process area. Processes such scooping, pouring and tipping all create dust problems. If these actions are eliminated or controlled the problem is easily solved.

The most cost effective containment solution is to use silicone sleeves and seals for containing dust during transfer processes. Scooping, tipping or pouring can all be replaced by using vacuum transfer systems which keeps material contained during any transfer process.

 

Q. Is containment a wise investment?
A.

Despite the inevitable costs associated with improving containment, the financial investment can be soon recaptured through improved efficiency. Reduction in waste by keeping products where they should be and in the case of vacuum conveying reduced manpower are obvious areas of a definite return on investment.

Improved safety also has an impact on productivity, which provides the additional benefit of an improved employee/employer relationship. To sum up it is quite clear that apart from certain legal requirements to ensure adequate operator safety there are potential longer term savings to be made in improving efficiency through a carefully planned contained process design.

 

To learn more about Hanningfield’s containment solutions, please click the link below:


Colin Ellis

About the Author

Colin Ellis is the Managing Director of Hanningfield. He has over 30 years experience in the process industries.

Prior to founding Hanningfield in 1987, Colin worked as an engineer for Smith and Nephew, May and Baker and GlaxoSmithKline.

E-Mail: colin@hanningfield.com

Technical Article: Explosive Dust Control

By Christopher Birch (Technical Sales Engineer, Hanningfield)


Introduction

The control of hazardous and explosive environments and substances is a duty of practically every organisation from manufacturing to education. The dangers associated with flammable, toxic and explosive substances such as wood, solvents or fuels are universally well understood and controls are carefully applied. The management and control of dust is perhaps less well understood despite the critical and catastrophic potential hazard.

Between the years 1980 and 2008, there have been 350 serious dust explosions in US factories killing 133 people and injuring many more. In 2003, in North Carolina, 6 people lost their lives due to a tragic dust explosion at West Pharmaceutical Services.

Dust build up is progressive and often occurs out of plain sight in ceiling voids, on top of machinery or in dust collection systems and their filters. Materials that are not normally considered flammable are often lethal as a dust, this includes most metals and other none flammable solids. In the Pharmaceutical industry the problem is compounded further by a general trend towards NANO scale high potency Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API’s) which are extremely toxic and because of their small size can be even more explosive.

Why is dust an explosive hazard?
Dusts have a very large surface area compared to their mass. Burning of solids or liquids can only occur at the surface, where it reacts with oxygen, dust particles are very small but have a high surface area. For example, a 1kg sphere of a material with a density of 1g/cm3 would be about 27 cm across and have a surface area of 0.23 m². However, if that sphere was broken down into spherical dust particles of 50µm in diameter (about the size of flour particles) it would have a surface area of 60 m²!

This greatly increased surface area allows the material to burn much faster, and the extremely small mass of each particle allows it to catch on fire with much less energy than the bulk material as there is no heat loss to conduction within the material. When a dust and air mixture explodes, especially in a confined space such as a silo or warehouse, a significant increase in pressure is created, often more than sufficient to demolish the structure.

There are five necessary conditions for a dust explosion or deflagration:

1. Fuel; presence of a combustible dust.
2. Ignition; there is an ignition source.
3. Dispersion; the dust is suspended in the air at a high concentration (LEL see below).
4. Confinement; the dust is confined.
5. Oxygen; there is an oxidant (typically atmospheric oxygen).

Sources of ignition:

• Electrostatic discharge (common),
• Friction,
• Arcing from machinery or other equipment,
• Hot surfaces, overheated bearings,
• Fire

Mechanism of Dust Explosions
Dust explosions are classified as being either primary or secondary in nature. Primary dust explosions occur inside process plant or similar enclosures and are generally controlled by pressure relief through purpose-built ducting to atmosphere. Secondary dust explosions are the result of dust accumulation inside the factory being disturbed and ignited by the primary explosion, resulting in a much more dangerous uncontrolled explosion inside the workplace. Historically, fatalities from dust explosions have largely been the result of secondary dust explosions.

What is special about dust explosions?

There are a few aspects of dust explosions that make such explosions special. When a flammable dust cloud is created, the dust particles are suspended in air, either because it falls from a height or because a blast of air raises the dust from a surface. Since dust is heavier than air, this will only last as long as the force that created the cloud is present. Some finer particles may remain suspended in air while the larger particles settle. Once settled the dust cloud can be raised again to form another flammable dust cloud.

This is different from gases and vapours that, once dispersed to below the lower flammable limit, cannot form an explosive mixture again.  This capacity to be re-suspended has its most serious consequences when a small explosion whirls up the dust deposits in the plant and then ignites the cloud. These secondary dust explosions are the reason why some plants have been destroyed virtually completely.

Another special aspect of dust explosions is that dust deposits can be ignited, for example, due to self-heating, or because the dust sits on a hot surface. A smouldering or burning dust deposit can be an ignition source for any dust cloud that is generated. Alternatively, the deposit may burn, causing fire damage.

Concentrations
Below a certain value, the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL), there is simply insufficient dust to support the combustion at the rate required for an explosion. A figure 20% lower than the LEL is considered safe. Similarly, if the fuel/air ratio increases above the upper explosive limit there is insufficient oxidant to permit combustion to continue at the necessary rate.

Classifying hazardous areas into zones - HSE Guidance
Once an area has been identified as hazardous it should be classified into zones based on the frequency and persistence of the potentially explosive atmosphere. This then determines the controls needed on potential sources of ignition in that area. These controls apply to fixed and mobile equipment, electrostatic discharges and other sources of ignition that maybe brought into the area, such as matches or lighters.

The international standard, BS EN 61241/3, published in 2002 explains the basic principles of area classification for dust hazards. This standard forms a suitable basis for assessing the extent and type of zone, and can be used as a guide to complying with the requirements of DSEAR. Site specific factors should always be taken into account.

Under ATEX regulations, hazardous areas for explosive dust atmospheres are classified into three zones:

1. Zone 20 is an area in which an explosive atmosphere, in the form of a cloud of combustible dust, is present continuously, for long periods or frequently.
2. Zone 21 is an area in which an explosive atmosphere, in the form of a cloud of combustible dust, is likely to occasionally occur in normal operation.
3. Zone 22 is an area in which an explosive atmosphere, in the form of a cloud of combustible dust, is not likely to occur in normal operation but, if it does occur, will persist for a short period.

On 6 April 2008, the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 came into force in the UK, which means companies could face severe fines or even imprisonment should a dust explosion occur.
Marking of equipment.

A standardised scheme is used to identify equipment suitable for a specific area. Equipment will carry the explosion protection symbol “Ex” in a hexagon, the equipment category number (1, 2 or 3), the letter G and or D depending on whether it’s intended for a gas or dust atmosphere and other essential safety information. In many cases this will include a temperature rating expressed as a “T” marking and sometimes a gas group. These indicate limitations to safe use.

Protection and Mitigation from dust explosions
Much research has been carried out in Europe and elsewhere to understand how to control these dangers, but explosions still occur. Increased awareness of the problem and the requirement to perform systematic risk assessments of all operations will lead to identification of hazardous situations and many should be eliminated before an explosion can occur. Good housekeeping practices and operating procedures should be used to prevent the build up of dust.

The alternatives for making processes and plants safer depend on the industry. Some industries exclude air from dust-raising processes, known as “Inerting”. Typically this uses nitrogen, carbon dioxide or argon, which are incombustible gases and thereby inhibit combustion. The same method is also used in large storage tanks where inflammable vapours can accumulate. Usage of oxygen-free gases, however, carries a risk of asphyxiation of the operator.

Other traditional methods are used to accommodate primary dust explosions in process machinery. These include 10 barg explosion arrest valves and sealed, positively pressurised control panels. Increasingly dust extraction is used to protect workers from exposure. Dust filters not only collect all the fine dust from the plant, they also create dust clouds during their cleaning or maintenance, so in effect the problem is simply moved from one location to another.

In the pharmaceutical industry this issue of cleaning and emptying dust collection systems is made more hazardous when a high potency API is present. Cyclones that remove over 95% of the air entrained dust before it reaches the filter are being used as an effective way to control and capture potentially dangerous excess dust. This method of dust control also helps pharmaceutical companies reconcile lost material as is required by cGMP standards.

Summary
Unlike solvents or explosive gasses, dust does not automatically disperse in the natural environment. Unless removed from areas of build up the risk of dust explosion progressively increases.

Avoidance of dust explosions and their catastrophic effect can be achieved by careful adherence to HSE guidelines and ATEX and DSEAR requirements. Good housekeeping practices enforced by well adopted operating procedures should be used to eliminate the build-up of deposits of combustible dust. Organisations should regularly inspect areas where dust can build up unseen.

Extraction and then capture of excess dust, by cyclone, before that dust can build up in dust filtration systems is an effective control measure in line with cGMP standards.


Company Description
Hanningfield Process Systems is a UK manufacturer of powder containment, powder processing and powder handling equipment. Hanningfield’s range of products include vacuum convey systems, milling and crushing machines, lifts and hoists and the unique Uni-Dust cyclone.

Manufactured in stainless steel, the filterless Uni-Dust cyclone is a hygienic method of capturing excess dust in the controlled environment of the process room. The equipment is designed to be retrofitted to any dust generating plant; process validation is not effected, making it ideal for both new and existing processes. In-line with cGMP the Uni-Dust makes loss reconciliation a simple matter.

The cyclone separates the solids from the clean air, capturing at least 95% excess powder in a collection pot, the air is then passed through a “police” HEPA filter which increases system efficiency to 99.99% before the clean rather than contaminated air flows to the normal dust extraction unit.


Chris Birch

About the Author

Chris Birch is a Technical Sales Engineer at Hanningfield, with 14 years experience working in diverse areas including containment, size reduction and material handling.

Chris is extremely familiar with cGMP, ATEX regulations, process validation, calibration and reference standard hierarchy.

E-Mail: chris.birch@hanningfield.com

Hanningfield on Front Page of EPM Magazine

Hanningfield are pleased to be on the front page of the January/February edition of EPM Magazine.  Hanningfield are prominently featured on the front page of the magazine, with an article about the Uni-Dust cyclone, and how it can be used to collect excess tablet press powder.


To see the editorial simply click the image above, or click here.

Technical Article: Understanding ATEX Milling

By Colin Ellis (Managing Director, Hanningfield)


Introduction to ATEX

Past legislation to control explosive atmospheres has only been concerned with electrical equipment. The current ATEX directives now include hazards from mechanical sources, such as mills. A seized bearing or mechanical failure causing excessive heat generation is as likely a cause of explosion as an electrical fault and is now considered of equal importance in the design and use of size reduction equipment for powder processing.

ATEX Standards
There are currently two European directives in existence, 94/9/EC which is principally for manufacturers and another for operators of the equipment 99/92/EC. 94/9 EC is implemented in the UK by the Equipment and Protective Systems intended for use in Potentially Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 1996 (EPS Regulations). 99/92/EC is implemented in the UK by the Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR).

Both EU directives have been in place for several years, 94/9/EC since 1st July 2003 and the provisions of 99/92/EC extended to 1st July 2006.

Complying with ATEX
To comply with these standards a number of precautions must be taken to eliminate any risk potential. The first step is to carry out a risk analysis (Ignition Hazard Assessment) on the product to be milled and the environment in which the size reduction process will take place. This assessment will determine type of hazardous zoning inside and outside the mill and should be carried out by the user of the equipment.

Using the information provided, the mill supplier can then design the equipment to meet the appropriate ATEX Directive measures. The mill supplier is also responsible to advise the user of any precautions necessary to operate the mill safely.

ATEX Categorisation
In addition to the consideration of mechanical machine features, further categorisation is divided between gas and dust risks. The levels of risk fall into various zones; 0, 1 or 2 for gas, 20, 21 and 22 for dust. There are also individual equipment categories; 1, 2 and 3 (see table).

Zone (Gas) Zone (Dust) Zone
Definition
Equipment Category Protection

Method

0 20 Explosive atmosphere is present continuously, for long periods or frequently. 1 Equipment must be safe under normal operation, expected and rare malfunction.
1 21 Explosive atmosphere is likely to occur occasionally under normal operation. 2 Equipment must be safe under normal operation, expected malfunction.
2 22 Explosive atmosphere may occur under abnormal operation and only persists for a short period. 3 Equipment must be safe under normal operation.

Source: RS Components

To comply with each level of risk various accessories may be fitted to the machine such as temperature sensors, nitrogen purging systems, earth-bonding and anti-static castors. ATEX rated electrical equipment and accessories are also used including motors, safety switches and control panels.

Equipment Location
It is important to ensure that when positioning equipment that either contains an explosive atmosphere, or is situated in an ATEX zoned environment that the location is matched with the equipment in use. If the equipment is situated in an ATEX zoned area then the external features of the mill must comply with the ATEX provisions according to the zone. Special care should be taken relating to the effect on the surrounding area and also affects resulting from the surrounding area.

Manufacturer’s Responsibilities
The mill manufacturer has a responsibility to the customer to provide correctly designed equipment and the user or purchaser has a legal right to expect an acceptable level of safety from the equipment supplier. It is therefore or paramount importance to ensure the user has adequate information on the limitations of use and operating parameters. Adequate instructions of the limitations of use and operation must be supplied along with training where required to ensure equipment is use safely and as intended.

The ATEX Compliant Hanningfield Mill
With many years experience of designing and supplying explosion category milling equipment, the Hanningfield UNI-MILL provides the ideal solution to meet ATEX legislation directives. Special features such as continuous earth design, temperature monitoring and nitrogen purging ensure appropriate compliance measures are in place for every machine supplied to meet the level of hazard specified.

Although ATEX legislation appears to be quite complex, with proper consultation between user and supplier a safe system that meets the requirements of ATEX can be fully complied with.

For more information on the Hanningfield Uni-Mill, click here.

Or to learn how to contact Technical Sales, click here.

Capturing Excess Dust from Tablet Compression Machines

Losing excess dust from a tablet press during processing can be a major problem. Usually this excess powder is piped down the LEV line, to the central dust extraction system. This powder will come into contact with various filters during this journey, often causing them to blind. Changing these filters can prove both expensive and time consuming.


The Uni-Dust cyclone is designed to overcome this problem. By placing the cyclone between the tablet press and the LEV line, excess powder can be collected in capture-pot at the foot of the cyclone; this allows batch losses to be reconciled inside the process room itself. Importantly, the Uni-Dust cyclone normally separates over 95%the solids from the air, allowing clean air to pass to the central dust extraction system.

For more information on the Uni-Dust cyclone, please click here.

Tag Cloud